Alternative Dispute Resolution Articles
Leasure, Stanley A., Eminent Domain Disputes: The Role for Mediation, International Right of Way Association Magazine, p. 32, March/April 2012.
Leasure, Stanley A., Arbitration after Hall Street v. Mattel: What Happens Next? University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 31 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 273 (2009)
Cited:
Christopher R. Drahozal, Contracting Around Hall Street, Lewis & Clark Law Review, 14 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 905 (2010); Codie Henderson, Business Law—The Hall Street Hangover: Recovering and Discovering Avenues for review of Arbitration Awards; Hall Street Assocs. v. Mattel, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 1396, Wyoming Law Review 2010 General Law Division Case Note, 10 WYLR 299 (2010); Becky L. Jacobs, Pugh’s Lawn Landscape Company, Inc. v. Jaycon Development Corporation: The Tennessee Court of Appeals Limits Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards, Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, 11 Transactions: Tenn. J. Bus. L. 199 (Fall, 2009); Renwood Winery, Inc.’s Verified Return to Alternative Writ of Mandate; Memorandum of Points and Authorities, W.J. Deutsch & Sons Ltd., Petitioner v. Superior Court of California County of Sacramento, Respondent, Renwood Winery, Inc. Real Party in Interest, 2010 WL 1804239, Appellate Petition, Motion, Filing, Cal. App. 3 Dist., Mar 29, 2010
Leasure, Stanley A. and Ragan, Kent P., Arbitration of Medical Malpractice Claims: Patient’s Dilemma and Doctor’s Delight? Mississippi College Law Review, 28 Miss. C. L. Rev. 51 (2009)
Cited:
Selected Articles on State Arbitration Laws, Domke on Commercial Arbitration, 3 Domke on Com. Arb. Appendix A (2011); Beth Bates Holliday, Causes of Action for Chiropractic Negligence, Causes of Action, 44 Causes of Action 2d 95 (2010); Becky L. Jacobs, Often Wrong, Never in Doubt: How Anti-Arbitration Expectancy Bias May Limit Access to Justice, Maine Law Review, 62 Me. L. Rev. 531 (2010); Carla Wong McMillian, What Will It Take to Get you in a New Car Today?: A Proposal for a New Federal Automobile Dealer Act, Gonzaga Law Review, 45 Gonz. L. Rev. 67 (2009-2010); S. Spencer Elg, Health Care Arbitration Agreements in Tennessee, Tennessee Bar Journal, 45-OCT TNBJ 15 (October, 2009); James C. Dunkelberger, Between a Rock and a Hard Place: the Plight of Health Care Arbitration Agreements under Federal Law, Brigham Young University Law Review, Notes & Comments, 2010 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 1869 (2010); Becky L. Jacobs, Pugh’s Lawn Landscape Company, Inc. v. Jaycon Development Corporation: The Tennessee Court of Appeals Limits Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards, Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, 11 Transactions: Tenn. J. Bus. L. 199 (Fall, 2009); Mississippi Code Annotated §§ 11-1-58, 11-1-59, 11-1-60, 11-1-61, 11-1-62, 11-1-65, 11-1-69, 11-7-13, 11-7-15, 11-1-17, Mississippi Code Annotated T. 11, Ch. 15, References and Annotations.
Leasure, Stanley A., Arbitration of Nursing Home Claims: Oklahoma Goes Its Own Way; Oklahoma Law Review, 60 Okla. L. Rev. 737 (2007)
Award:
Best Theoretical Paper Award 2007-2008, College of Business Administration, Missouri State University.
Cited:
Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Beverly Enterprises-Illinois, Inc. v. Blazier, Supreme Court of the United States, No. 09-746, 2009 WL 5112691 (Dec. 22, 2009); Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Beverly Enterprises-Illinois, Inc. v. Mitchell, Supreme Court of the United States, No, 09-747, 2009 WL 5112698 (Dec. 22, 2009); Eleanor L. Grossman, Glenda K. Harnad, Jeffrey J. Shampo, Arbitration Agreements-Requisites, Validity, and Effect, American Jurisprudence 2d, 4 Am. Jur. 2d Alternative Dispute Resolution § 46 (2010); Robert J. Rice, Nursing Home Liability, American Jurisprudence Proof of Facts 3d, 24 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 73 (2011); Daniel J. Penofsky, Litigating Nursing Home Negligence and Wrongful Death Cases, American Jurisprudence Trials, 110 Am. Jur. Trials 1, (2011); Marjorie A. Shields, Validity, Construction, and Application of Arbitration Agreement in Contract for Admission to Nursing Home, American Law Reports 6th, 50 A.L.R. 6th 187 (2009); Lisa Tripp, A Senior Moment: Executive Branch Solution to the Problem of Binding Arbitration Agreements in Nursing Home Admission Contracts, Campbell Law Review, 31 Campbell L. Rev. 157, 194 (2009); Stanley A. Leasure and Kent P. Ragan, Arbitration of Medical Malpractice Claims: Patient’s Dilemma and Doctor’s Delight? Mississippi College Law Review, 28 Miss. C. L. Rev. 51 (2009); Stanley A. Leasure and Wayne L. Anderson, Arbitration of Attorney/Client Disputes: The Missouri Perspective; Journal of the Missouri Bar, 64 J. Mo. Bar 132 (2008); Stanley A. Leasure and Wayne L. Anderson, Arbitration in Arkansas: A Legal Primer, The Arkansas Lawyer, 43-Fall Ark. Law. 14 (2008); Oklahoma Statutes Annotated, 12 O.S.A. § 1857; 63 O.S.A. § 1-1939; Vernon’s Oklahoma Forms, 4C Vernon’s Oklahoma Forms 2d §10.4, Uniform Consumer Credit Code, Oklahoma Pawnshop Act, Oklahoma Deferred Lending Act, John Warner National Defense Authorization Act (2011).
Leasure, Stanley A., Vacatur of Arbitration Awards: The Poor Loser Problem or Loser Pays? University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 29 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 489 (2007)
Cited:
Gronlund, Ann C., The Future of Manifest Disregard as a Valid Ground for Vacating Arbitration Awards in Light of the Supreme Court’s Ruling in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., Iowa Law Review, 96 Iowa L. Rev. 1351 (2011); Howard Brill, 1 Arkansas Law of Damages § 17:13, Arbitration (2010); Jay E. Grenig, Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards, 1 Alternative Dispute Resolution with Forms § 24:10, Third Edition (2010); Stanley A. Leasure and Kent P. Ragan, Arbitration of Medical Malpractice Claims: Patient’s Dilemma and Doctor’s Delight? Mississippi College Law Review, 29 Miss. C. L. Rev. 51 (2009); Stanley A. Leasure, Arbitration after Hall Street v. Mattel: What Happens Next? University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 31 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 273 (2009); Justin Burney, Recent Law Review Articles Concerning the Legal Profession, Journal of the Legal Profession, 32 J. Legal Prof. 339, 348 (2008); Stanley A. Leasure and Wayne L. Anderson, Arbitration in Arkansas: A Legal Primer, Arkansas Lawyer, 43-Fall Ark. Law. 14 (2008); Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee, Southco, Inc. v. Reell Precision Manufacturing Corporation, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 08-2915, 2008 WL 8169323 (Nov. 18, 2008).
Leasure, Stanley A. and Anderson, Wayne L., Arbitration of Attorney/Client Disputes: The Missouri Perspective; Journal of the Missouri Bar, 64 J. Mo. Bar 132 (2008)
Cited:
Nancy Levit, Familial and Matrimonial Agreements: An Annotated Bibliography, Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 23 Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 453 (2010); Martin Domke, Larry Edmondson and Gabriel N. Wilner, Selected Articles on State Arbitration Laws, 2 Domke on Commercial Arbitration 3d, Appendix A (August, 2009); Stanley A. Leasure and Kent P. Ragan, Arbitration of Medical Malpractice Claims: Patient’s Dilemma and Doctor’s Delight? Mississippi College Law Review, 28 Miss. C. L. Rev. 51 (2009).
Leasure, Stanley A. and Anderson, Wayne L., Attorney/Client Disputes in Oklahoma: A Role for Arbitration? Oklahoma Bar Journal, 79 Okla. B.J. 847 (2008)
Cited:
Stanley A. Leasure and Kent P. Ragan, Arbitration of Medical Malpractice Claims: Patient’s Dilemma and Doctor’s Delight? Mississippi College Law Review, 28 Miss. C. L. Rev. 51 (2009); Oklahoma Statutes Annotated, 12 O.S.A. § 1851.
Leasure, Stanley A., Summary Judgment for Failure to Mediate: Is it Really That Simple? Journal of the Kansas Bar Association, 77 J. Kan. B.A. 22 (2008)
Cited:
West’s Kansas Statutes Annotated Chapter 5, Arbitration and Award Article 5, Dispute Resolution, K.S.A. 5-502.
Leasure, Stanley A. and Anderson, Wayne L., Arbitration in Arkansas: A Legal Primer, The Arkansas Lawyer, 43 Ark. Law. 14 (2008)
Cited:
Martin Domke, Larry Edmondson and Gabriel N. Wilner, Selected Articles on State Arbitration Laws, 2 Domke on Commercial Arbitration 3d, Appendix A, (2011); Arkansas Code Annotated §§ 16-108-201, 16-108-202, 16-108-212, 16-108-214.
Leasure, Stanley A. and Bowen, John R., Post-Pyett Collective Bargaining Agreements and Arbitration: The Elephant is Still in the Room, CCH Labor Law Journal, Summer 2011, pp.67-80.
Eminent Domain Articles
Leasure, Stanley A. and Miller, Carol J., Eminent Domain-Missouri’s Response to Kelo, Journal of the Missouri Bar, 63 J. Mo. Bar 178 (2007)
Cited:
Mark S. Dennison, Eminent Domain: Proof of Lack of Reasonable Necessity for Taking Property, American Jurisprudence Proof of Facts 3d, 71 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 97, (2011); Jeremy T. Cranford, The Missouri Eminent Domain Reforms of 2006 “Good Faith Negotiation” Requirement: Cities Can Use Illegitimate Appraisals Under Kansas City v. Ku, Missouri Law Review, 74 Mo. L. Rev. 1083 (2009); Anita J. Patel, Interpreting Eminent Domain in Missouri: Elimination of Blight is Allright, Missouri Law Review, 74 Mo. L. Rev. 235 (2009); Carol Miller, Eminent Domain Controversy: Property Rights versus Economic Development, Regional Business Review, 28 Reg. Bus. Rev. 92, 109 (2009); Michele Alexandre, “Love Don’t Live Here Anymore”: Economic Incentives for a More Equitable Model of Urban Redevelopment, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law review 35 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 1, 43 (2008); Brief of Respondent Ivanhoe Neighborhood Council, Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of Kansas City, Appellant v. Ivanhoe Neighborhood Council, Respondent, Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, No. WD70655, 2009 WL 5113447 (Nov 13, 2009); Amicus Curiae Brief of Pacific Legal Foundation, Station Investments #10 Development Corporation, et al., Appellants v. Cortex West Development Corporation, Supreme Court of Missouri En Banc, No. SC89543, 2008 WL 5480958 (Dec. 04, 2008); Vernon’s Annotated Missouri Statutes, Const. Art. 1, §§ 26; 28; Vernon’s Annotated Missouri Statutes §§ 238.247; 353.020; 353.030; 523.256; 523.262; 523.271; and 523.286.
Miller, Carol J. and Leasure, Stanley A., Post-Kelo Determination of Public Use and Eminent Domain in Economic Development under Arkansas Law; Arkansas Law Review, 59 Ark. L. Rev. 43 (2006)
Cited:
David Mark, Taking One for the Team: The Persistent Abuse of Eminent Domain in Sports Stadium Construction, FIU Law Review, 5 FIU L. Rev. 781 (2011); Dru Stevenson, A Million Little Things, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 14 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 1 (2011); Howard Brill, 1 Arkansas Law of Damages § 18:1, The Power of Eminent Domain (2010); Robert C. Bird and Lynda Oswald, Necessity as a Check on State Eminent Domain Power, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Construction Law, 12 U. Pa. J. Const.L. 99 (2009); Stanley A. Leasure, Arbitration after Hall Street v. Mattel: What Happens Next? University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 31 U. Ark. Little L. Rev. 273, 313 (2009); Lamar Odom and Analco Gonzalez, Kelo v. City of New London: An Ideal Case to Teach Ethical and Legal Principles, Journal of Legal Studies in Education, 25 J. Leg. Studies Education 343 (2008); Stanley A. Leasure and Carol J. Miller, Eminent Domain-Missouri’s Response to Kelo, Journal of the Missouri Bar, 63 J. Mo. B. 178, 190 (2007); Irma S. Russell, Got Wheels? Article 2A, Standardized Rental Car Terms, Rational Inaction, and Unilateral Private Ordering, Loyola Los Angeles Law Review, 40 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 137, 184 (2006); Reply Brief of Appellant, Ralph Loyd Martin Revocable Trust, Ralph Loyd Martin, Trustee, et al v. Arkansas Mainstream Services Corp., 2009 WL 6496872, (No. 09-141); Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Mipro Homes, L.L.C. v. Mount Laurel Township, Supreme Court of the United States, No. 06-1345, 2007 WL 1059570 (Apr. 06, 2007); Arkansas Constitution Article 2 §§ 22, 23; Arkansas Constitution Amendment 78, References and Annotations; Arkansas Code Annotated T. 14, Subtitle 10, Chapter 168, Subchapter 3, References and Annotations, Arkansas Code Annotated §5-14-103.
Accounting Articles
Leasure, Stanley A. and Phillips, Jana A., Too Critical to Fail: What Saved the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board? International Research Journal of Applied Finance, Vol. III, Issue 7, pp. 995-1009, July, 2012.
Leasure, Stanley A. and Debra H. Oden, Criminal Tax Evasion and Criminal Intent: Supreme Court Says No Harm, No Foul, The CPA Journal, June 2009, p. 40 (2009)
Leasure, Stanley A., Interests in LLPs and LLCs: Not Presumptively Passive Activities, CPA Focus, January/February 2010, Vol. 10 No. 4, p. 30 (2010)
Other Articles
Leasure, Stanley A., Cash Justice and the Rule of Law: Post-Caperton Financing of Judicial Elections, Idaho Law Review, 46 Idaho L. R. 619 (2010)
Cited:
Charles Gardner Geyh, Why Judicial Disqualification Matters. Again., Review of Litigation, Symposium 2011, 30 Rev. Litig. 671 (2011); Raymond J McKoski, Judicial Disqualification after Caperton v. Massey Coal Company: What’s Due Process Got to Do With It?, Baylor Law Review, 63 Baylor L. Rev. 368 (2011).
Leasure, Stanley A. and Owens, Robert W., A Survey of Missouri County Assessors Regarding Business Enterprise Value; Real Estate Review, 37 Real Estate Review 9 (2008)
Cited:
Robert W. Owens, Taxing Real Estate and Business Enterprise Valuation: Improved Phrasing but a Continuing Controversy, Fall 2009 pp.37-51.
Leasure, Stanley A., Eighth Circuit Delivers Mixed Bag to Bankruptcy Attorneys: Where Will It End? Southern Law Journal, 19 Southern L. J. 39 (2009)