Eminent Domain

Supreme Court: Temporary Flooding Constitutes Taking

by Stanley Leasure on December 5, 2012

  Recently the United States Supreme Court in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, determined that temporary flooding can constitute a taking under the Takings Clause of Fifth Amendment. [1] The facts of the case are straightforward. The Arkansas Game and Fish commission owns 23,000 acres adjacent to the Black River which it operates as wildlife [...]

Another example of the legacy of the Kelo case has arisen in Columbia, Missouri. On April 2 the voters there will decide: whether to prohibit the City from: (1) using eminent domain to acquire property for economic development” if the City intends that the property will end up in private hands for private purposes, and [...]

Mediators in Eminent Domain/Condemnation Cases: All the Same?

by Stanley Leasure on September 16, 2012

Mediator selection in any dispute is important, but never more so than in eminent domain cases. Parties in these specialized cases will almost always find it advantageous to employ a  mediator with the following qualifications: (1) significant mediation experience (process skills); and (2) significant eminent domain experience (subject matter skills). Condemnation cases are unique, involving unique terminology, [...]

Can Lawyers Predict Case Outcomes?

by Stanley Leasure on May 14, 2012

I recently found a 2010 article describing a study which will benefit lawyers and parties on both sides of eminent domain/condemnation cases. It deals directly, and in detail, with the question of how well lawyers can predict case outcomes.[1] Litigation savvy clients, and lawyers—as well as knowledgeable observers of the legal profession—would agree that the [...]

Last time we continued our discussion on the mistakes lawyers and their clients make in settling eminent domain cases. The focus of our discussion was:  Let’s Not Make a Deal: An Empirical Study of Decision Making in Unsuccessful Settlement Negotiations an article co-authored by Randall L. Kaiser et al.[i] We examined the frequency lawyers and their clients commit [...]

Settlement Mistakes in Eminent Domain–Condemnation Cases

by Stanley Leasure on April 17, 2012

Last time we began our discussion of the mistakes lawyers and their clients make in settling eminent domain cases with an overview of an article entitled:  Let’s Not Make a Deal: An Empirical Study of Decision Making in Unsuccessful Settlement Negotiations co-authored by Randall L. Kaiser et al.[1] As you will recall, the Kaiser article [...]

Settlement Mistakes in Eminent Domain Cases: Frequency and Amount

April 10, 2012

Lawyers and their clients make mistakes in settling eminent domain cases … sometimes big mistakes. A study published in 2008 developed a number of interesting results that can inform what we do as lawyers, mediators, arbitrators, condemnors, and condemnees called on to settle eminent domain cases.[1] The study looked at three data sets; 2,054 cases [...]

Read the full article →

U.S. House Responds to Kelo

March 8, 2012

We have previously discussed Kelo City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) the landmark eminent domain case decided in 2005 by the United States Supreme Court. A challenge to the takings by the affected landowners ended up in the United States Supreme Court. The Court determined, 5-4 that the City’s economic redevelopment plan served a “public purpose” sufficient [...]

Read the full article →

Eminent Domain Settlement Errors

March 3, 2012

Settlement of a dispute using negotiation or mediation is identical in one respect: the parties give up the right to have the case resolved through litigation (or arbitration). The first task, therefore, is to estimate what will happen if the case proceeds to adjudication. How good are we at that? Are plaintiffs and their lawyers [...]

Read the full article →

Partial Takings and Severance Damage

January 1, 2012

Today let’s discuss the measure of damages due a landowner when the condemning authority takes only part of the landowner’s property. Assume: (1) Susan Jones owns a three bedroom two bath house on a 75 x 150′ lot. (2) The 75′ side of the lot fronts on Elm Street. (3) The City, using its power of [...]

Read the full article →